Skip to content

For pentesters and auditors

What you find at a client does not belong in your personal AI subscription.

Abliterated models and frontier LLMs for AI pentesting, under a DPA instead of a personal subscription. Almost every pentest turns up real data: employee records, customer data, emails, tokens. Pasting it into ChatGPT or Claude for analysis hands your client's personal data to a service the client never approved. 2342.ai gives you security and frontier models under one contract, with data paths you can disclose to your client.

GDPR Article 28 in everyday pentesting

Every additional service is a subprocessor your client has to approve.

If you process personal data on behalf of a client, you need their prior authorization for every additional processor (Art. 28(2) GDPR). A personal chat subscription cannot be approved that way: no contract with your company, no control over retention and training, processing often in the United States. With 2342.ai you name one provider with a DPA and a published subprocessor list, and you decide per data type which data path is used.

Data path by data type

Personal data findings: EU data path.

Analyze dumps, responses and logs containing personal data with models the catalog lists with an EU data path. BB Arena shows that several of them complete pentest tasks without refusals.

  • Claude Opus 5: 60 of 100 labs solved, no refusals
  • GLM 5.3: 57 of 100 labs solved, no refusals
  • ChatGPT 5.6 Sol: 46 of 100 labs solved, no refusals

Security models

Abliterated models for attack and exploit work.

When frontier models stop, specialized security LLMs and abliterated models such as CyberGLM, CyberKimi and Abliterated Model Large take over. The inference provider stores no data (zero data retention); processing takes place in Norway, Iceland and the United States. That is why these models are for technical content without personal data.

  • API only
  • Enabled by the organization admin
  • Zero data retention at the inference provider
  • Processing locations disclosed

Verifiable

Documentation you can show your client.

Add the DPA, subprocessor list and per-model data path from the catalog to your proposal or report. Usage and cost run through one invoice and stay traceable per API key.

  • DPA under Art. 28 GDPR
  • Published subprocessors
  • Data path per model in the catalog
  • One contract, one invoice

Use it on engagements

Inform your client, enable access, set the data path per data type.

01

Inform your client

Add 2342.ai as an additional processor to your DPA. The DPA and subprocessor list are publicly available.

02

Enable external models

The organization admin enables external models. The security models are then available with the organization's API keys.

03

Set the data path per data type

Attack steps with security models, personal data findings with EU data path models, the report in your own workspace.

What happens if I paste client data into a personal AI subscription?

You transfer your client's data to a provider they have not approved, under consumer terms and often to the United States. That can breach your DPA and the GDPR, and your client may have to assess whether a reportable personal data breach occurred.

What are abliterated models?

Abliteration identifies the direction in a model's activations that triggers refusals and removes it from the weights. The model no longer refuses tasks, while its other capabilities stay largely intact. For security testing, that means exploit code, payloads and attack chains without interruptions, but also without built-in guardrails. That is why we offer them only through the API and only to organizations that have enabled them.

Why do Claude or ChatGPT refuse some pentest tasks?

Providers use safeguards against cyberattacks, and they trigger especially often on the newest models. In BB Arena, Claude Opus 5.5 was stopped in 51 of 100 labs, ChatGPT 6.1 Sol in 67. Other models such as Claude Opus 5, GLM 5.3 and ChatGPT 5.6 Sol completed the same labs without refusals.

Which models suit findings with personal data?

Models the catalog lists with an EU data path. The security models process in Norway, Iceland and the United States and are not intended for that.

Do I need authorization for the test itself?

Yes. Without a written engagement and a clear scope, a test can be a criminal offense. The terms permit the security models only for authorized engagements and your own systems.

Are the security models available in the web chat?

No. They are only available through the API, using the keys of an organization whose admin has enabled external models.